NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2944 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10970 vs 10786
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 20291
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 20291
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3652
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3652
- 108.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 58
- 108.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10970 vs 10786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 | 10970 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 6293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 98 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |