NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 5393x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10786 vs 2
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 23 July 2019
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10786 vs 2

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1365 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 20291
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 20291
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
  • 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 58
  • 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 58
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1650 MHz vs 1365 MHz
Boost clock speed 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27179 vs 20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27179 vs 20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 58

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
10786
2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20291
27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20291
27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58
3355
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10786 2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20291 27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20291 27179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3652 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3652 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 58 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 58 3355
PassMark - G3D Mark 19608
PassMark - G2D Mark 927
Geekbench - OpenCL 117526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 337.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4566.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 190.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1654.321

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU104
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 23 July 2019
Place in performance rating 203 109
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1815 MHz
Core clock speed 1365 MHz 1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.585 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3072
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 299.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million
CUDA cores 3072
Maximum GPU temperature 89 C
Render output units 64

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 6 pin + 8 pin
Width Dual-slot 2-Slot
Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s 496 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready