NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 5393x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10786 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 20291
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 20291
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3652
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 58
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 20291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 | 2 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19608 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 109 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | Dual-slot | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |