NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • 1400.2x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 13738
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 13738
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 21 March 2015
Core clock speed 1365 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1560 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 299.5 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20291 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20291 vs 13738

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3652
  • 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 58
  • 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 58
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 58

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20291
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20291
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3652
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58
3356
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10795
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20291 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20291 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3652 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3652 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 58 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 58 3356
PassMark - G3D Mark 11792
PassMark - G2D Mark 737
Geekbench - OpenCL 37354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell 2.0
Code name TU104 GM200
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 203 242
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,199.99
Price now $2,825
Value for money (0-100) 4.69

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1365 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.585 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3072
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 299.5 GTexel/s 213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 8,000 million
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5