NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 19571
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 19571
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 19571 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 10786
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 vs 10786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 | 13943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 112 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |