NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 69812
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 13044
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 7164
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 13044
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 82601 vs 69812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 13799
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 583
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13932 vs 13799
PassMark - G2D Mark 815 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13799
13932
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
815
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
82601
69812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20344
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20344
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 13799 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark 583 815
Geekbench - OpenCL 82601 69812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104B Vega 10
Launch date 2 Apr 2020 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 136 118
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1080 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 207.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6