NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13789 vs 12929
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 61335
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 16952
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3718
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 16952
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3718
- Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8562 vs 6261
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13789 vs 12929 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 vs 61335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3718 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 vs 6261 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 583 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13789 | 12929 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 583 | 813 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | 61335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 | 6261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU116 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 136 | 201 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |