NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 6319
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 6319
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2944 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 6319 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 88% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 13787
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 582
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 20344
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3355
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 20344
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3355
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10134 vs 8549
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 13787 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 20344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 20344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10134 vs 8549 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13787 | 15107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 582 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 5714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8549 | 10134 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 137 | 106 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |