NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3290
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19286 vs 13787
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 582
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136245 vs 82601
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 20344
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 20344
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 vs 13787 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 582 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 vs 82601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 20344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 20344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13787 | 19286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 582 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 | 136245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8549 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU102 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 137 | 103 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |