NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18818 vs 3162
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 418
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102127 vs 50809
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 6796
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3722
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3362
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 6796
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3722
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 2 October 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18818 vs 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102127 vs 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3362 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 215 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18818 | 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102127 | 50809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10973 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 2 October 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 419 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |