NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3712
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3353
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3712
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12613 vs 6890
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 413
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 59733 vs 50576
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 15760
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 15760
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 vs 6890 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 413 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 vs 50576 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 15760 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6890 | 12613 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 816 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50576 | 59733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4897 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 2021 | 4 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 192 | 173 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1499 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 95.94 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 239.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
Compute units | 40 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | IGP |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |