NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3358
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 960 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11355 vs 6890
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 540 vs 413
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 15760
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 15760
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5906 vs 4899
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 960 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 vs 6890 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 vs 413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 15760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 15760 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5906 vs 4899 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6890 | 11355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | 540 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4899 | 5906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA107 | TU106B |
Launch date | 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 206 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 960 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |