NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 339.841 vs 226.447
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.109 vs 25.476
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 155.642 vs 118.544
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1167.569 vs 1106.12
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 19811
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3358
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 19811
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3719
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 817 MHz
• Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1282 MHz
• 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 vs 13388
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 589
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 79058
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3898.264
• Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 8234

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13388 16059
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 749
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	79058 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	339.841 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3898.264 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.109 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.642 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1167.569 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8234 10685

Compare specifications (specs)