NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1282 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3652
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3290
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3652
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 817 MHz
• 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 13389
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 589
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 79058
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 339.841
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3898.264
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 27.109
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 155.642
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1167.569
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 21278
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 21278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13389 19370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 869
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	79058 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	339.841 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3898.264 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.109 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.642 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1167.569 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3290

Compare specifications (specs)