NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 13932
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 815
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88335 vs 69812
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 304.563 vs 171.616
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.79 vs 16.925
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 13044
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88335 vs 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 304.563 vs 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 vs 16.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 187.542
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 1141.654
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3717
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3356
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3717
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 vs 4024.711 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 187.542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 vs 1141.654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88335 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 304.563 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4024.711 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.542 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.654 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8754 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 126 | 117 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |