NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8754 vs 8346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8754 vs 8346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 170 Watt
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88335 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 304.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4024.711 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.79 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 187.542 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8754 | 8346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 127 | 236 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1140 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 7.066 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 220.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |