NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 vs 337.794
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4619.617 vs 4566.815
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 vs 31.631
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3716
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3355
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3716
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3355
- 5217x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10434 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 vs 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 vs 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 vs 31.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10434 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19601 vs 15523
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 651
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117477 vs 89617
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 vs 181.818
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 vs 1410.887
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 24877
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 24877
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19601 vs 15523 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 651 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117477 vs 89617 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 vs 181.818 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 vs 1410.887 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 24877 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 24877 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15523 | 19601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 651 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89617 | 117477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 4566.815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10434 | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 82 | 109 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI |