NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 280 Watt
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 vs 3707
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 vs 3353
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 vs 3707
  • 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 vs 18 December 2018
Pipelines 5120 vs 4608
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 11471 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 13334 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 11471 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 13334 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1290 MHz
  • 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 15502
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 650
  • Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 89617
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 24877
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 24877
  • Around 45% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 10437
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 780 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19986 vs 15502
PassMark - G2D Mark 827 vs 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 vs 89617
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 24877
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 24877
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 15164 vs 10437

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15502
19986
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
650
827
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
89617
138072
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24877
25820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11471
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13334
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24877
25820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11471
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13334
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
10437
15164
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN RTX
PassMark - G3D Mark 15502 19986
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 827
Geekbench - OpenCL 89617 138072
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 449.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4619.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 181.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1410.887
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 24877 25820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 11471 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 13334 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 24877 25820
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 11471 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 13334 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10437 15164

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q NVIDIA TITAN RTX

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA104 TU102
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 18 December 2018
Place in performance rating 80 90
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1290 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.21 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5120 4608
Pixel fill rate 103.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 206.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 280 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDMI
DisplayPort count 3

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 384.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready