NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 205 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26458 vs 11065
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26458 vs 11065
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 vs 3718
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 vs 3718
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 vs 3360
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 19 Nov 2019 |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 | 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 | 3360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15228 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69098 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 19 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 194 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 124.8 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 205 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10300 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |