NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26458 vs 16162
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26458 vs 16162
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 vs 3719
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 vs 3719
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 vs 3373
- 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 vs 3373
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 | 3373 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22318 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 76 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 124.8 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |