NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • 1166.9x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26458 vs 13738
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26458 vs 13738
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 vs 3714
  • 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 vs 3714
  • 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 vs 3356
  • 6.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 vs 21 March 2015
Core clock speed 1110 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1560 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 5120 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26458 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26458 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 12868 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 12868 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20579 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20579 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26458
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26458
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12868
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12868
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20579
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20579
3356
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26458 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26458 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 12868 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 12868 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20579 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20579 3356
PassMark - G3D Mark 11792
PassMark - G2D Mark 737
Geekbench - OpenCL 37354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Maxwell 2.0
Code name GA104 GM200
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 45 242
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,199.99
Price now $2,825
Value for money (0-100) 4.69

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5120 3072
Pixel fill rate 124.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s 213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 8,000 million
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready