NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16503 vs 15107
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 22622
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 22622
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11905 vs 10104
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16503 vs 15107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 22622 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11905 vs 10104 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 643
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3719
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3359
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3719
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16503 | 15107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105640 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 22622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 5714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11905 | 10104 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 119 | 106 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |