NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 vs 293.508
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 vs 29.145
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 vs 158.103
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 vs 25232
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 vs 3718
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 vs 3359
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 vs 25232
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 vs 3718
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 vs 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 vs 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 vs 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 vs 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 vs 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3552.807
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1422.602
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1422.602 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18245 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100123 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 92 | 134 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI |