NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 10240 vs 3840
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27218 vs 22325
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 vs 973
- Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 126223
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 vs 432.118
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 vs 41.585
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 vs 2280.457
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 16162
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 16162
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19748 vs 16309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 3840 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27218 vs 22325 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 vs 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 126223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 vs 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 vs 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 vs 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 16162 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19748 vs 16309 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 129.036
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27218 | 22325 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 126223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 383.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19748 | 16309 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA102 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $579 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 76 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10240 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 912.4 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |