NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 5.3x more pipelines: 10240 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27216 vs 14151
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1092 vs 750
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 70668
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 vs 220.337
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 vs 21.852
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 vs 1141.283
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 20094
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 20094
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19749 vs 7489
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 7 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27216 vs 14151 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19749 vs 7489 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3131.344 vs 661.977
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.923 vs 129.036
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3359
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 vs 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 vs 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27216 | 14151 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19749 | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU106 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10240 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 912.4 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |