NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25320 vs 21784
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 935
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168014 vs 138583
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 394.035
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 5461.22
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 41.133
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 173.697
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1987.605
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 23659
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 23659
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17705 vs 14612
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25320 vs 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 168014 vs 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 23659 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17705 vs 14612 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25320 | 21784 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 168014 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17705 | 14612 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU102 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 83 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X |