NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
  • 4.6x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188222 vs 85714
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 282.628
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 3403.106
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 24.719
  • Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 136.919
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1010.818
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 20206
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 20206
  • 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19876 vs 7856
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 vs 13 November 2018
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
Pipelines 10496 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 188222 vs 85714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 732.196 vs 282.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7585.258 vs 3403.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 63.011 vs 24.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.569 vs 136.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2441.384 vs 1010.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398 vs 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398 vs 20206
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19876 vs 7856

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
188222
85714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
732.196
282.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7585.258
3403.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
63.011
24.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
247.569
136.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2441.384
1010.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33398
20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33398
20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
19876
7856
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 26836
PassMark - G2D Mark 1050
Geekbench - OpenCL 188222 85714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 732.196 282.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7585.258 3403.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 63.011 24.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.569 136.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2441.384 1010.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33398 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33398 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19876 7856

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA102 TU104
Launch date 1 Sep 2020 13 November 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $1499 $899
Place in performance rating 42 194
Type Desktop Desktop
GCN generation Quadro RTX

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1695 MHz 1545 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) 222.5 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) 14.24 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 35.58 TFLOPS 7.119 TFLOPS
Pipelines 10496 2304
Pixel fill rate 189.8 GPixel/s 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s 222.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 350 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 28300 million 13600 million
Render output units 64
Texture Units 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 138 mm (5.4 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 313 mm (12.3 inches) 9.5 inches (241 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin 1x 8-pin
Width Triple-slot

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 936.2 GB/s 416.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6