NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 1677.2x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 205.417
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 4198.719
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 19.996
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 218.069
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 940.599
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 20 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 205.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 4198.719 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 19.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 218.069 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 940.599 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1430 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 206586 vs 188320
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1430 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 206586 vs 188320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26815 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 | 206586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 205.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 4198.719 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 19.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 218.069 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 940.599 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA102 | GP100 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $4,599 |
Place in performance rating | 40 | 124 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 10496 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Triple-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |