NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1166 vs 612
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26959 vs 13637
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 80223
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1166 vs 612 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26959 vs 13637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 vs 80223 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 285 Watt
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 3854
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 285 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 vs 3854 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1166 | 612 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26959 | 13637 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 | 80223 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3854 | 7412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 417.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.476 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 245.639 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2459.317 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD104 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 35 | 107 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5888 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 167.0 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6950 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 GRE
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
