NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 810 and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 4 November 2015 vs 27 August 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 82.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 2x 512
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 2x 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2x 1,058 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 810
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
Name | NVIDIA NVS 810 | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1179 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 297 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 810 | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 4 November 2015 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 581 | 516 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,058 gflops | 2,637 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 512 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec | 82.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 8x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 221 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 14.4 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |