NVIDIA P102-100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P102-100 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P102-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 743 MHz
- 26.6x more texture fill rate: 316.4 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 3200 vs 320
- 21.3x better floating-point performance: 10,125 gflops vs 475.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 80 nm
- 10x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 512 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 1656 MHz
Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 743 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3200 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops vs 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P102-100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Name | NVIDIA P102-100 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64572 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 660 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P102-100 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP102 | R600 |
Launch date | 12 February 2018 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 375 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 743 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 10,125 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 3200 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 316.4 GTexel / s | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 400.3 GB / s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR3 |