NVIDIA P106-100 vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 975 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 975 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6357 vs 4521
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 72.514
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1506.404
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 7.267
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 vs 359.237
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 7102
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 7102
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4061 vs 1499

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 255
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 34712
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 76.32
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1680
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6357 4521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	255 605
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34712 86561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.993 72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705.321 1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.266 7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	76.32 116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	448.036 359.237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12824 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1860 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4061 1499

Compare specifications (specs)