NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 16.2 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 518.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 3.5x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2060 vs 628
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 July 2010 vs 12 December 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 vs 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 397 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 405 MHz
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 405 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23008 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7205 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | R600 |
Launch date | 27 July 2010 | 12 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 376 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 405 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 16.2 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 118.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |