NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs ATI Radeon X800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5010M and ATI Radeon X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 986 MHz
- 21.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1772 vs 84
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 vs 1 November 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 986 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1772 vs 84 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 GT
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 315
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 315 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI Radeon X800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1772 | 84 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 423 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | ATI Radeon X800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R400 |
Code name | GF110 | R430 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 1 November 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 567 | 370 |
Price now | $235.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 3.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 31.55 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 986 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |