NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 34.2x more texture fill rate: 463.0 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 192
- 45.6x better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 31.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 641
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 441
- 18.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 1087
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3071
- 18.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 1087
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3071
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops vs 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1696 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 | 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3071 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GV100 | GK208 |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 95 | 830 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz | 846 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | 324.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | 13.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 1270 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1696 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |