NVIDIA Quadro GV100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro GV100 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 846 MHz
  • 34.2x more texture fill rate: 463.0 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
  • 26.7x more pipelines: 5120 vs 192
  • 45.6x better floating-point performance: 14,817 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
  • 31.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 641
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 441
  • 18.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3071
  • 18.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3071
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 March 2018 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1132 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate 463.0 GTexel / s vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines 5120 vs 192
Floating-point performance 14,817 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 20021 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 888 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19663 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19663 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1696 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 1696 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20021
641
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
888
441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19663
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19663
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3071
Name NVIDIA Quadro GV100 NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark 20021 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 888 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 160720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 562.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 141.066
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1964.377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19663 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19663 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3071

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro GV100 NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Essentials

Architecture Volta Kepler 2.0
Code name GV100 GK208
Launch date 27 March 2018 23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $8,999
Place in performance rating 95 830
Type Workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1628 MHz
Core clock speed 1132 MHz 846 MHz
Floating-point performance 14,817 gflops 324.9 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 5120 192
Texture fill rate 463.0 GTexel / s 13.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 21,100 million 1270 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 870.4 GB / s 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1696 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus