NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2916 vs 1626
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 572
  • Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8708 vs 5885
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 2536
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 1586
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 2418
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 2536
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 1586
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 2418
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 January 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2916 vs 1626
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 vs 572
Geekbench - OpenCL 8708 vs 5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 vs 2418

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2916
1626
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
577
572
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8708
5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4080
2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1721
1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
2418
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark 2916 1626
PassMark - G2D Mark 577 572
Geekbench - OpenCL 8708 5885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1721 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1721 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 2418

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Generation 8.0
Code name GM107 Broadwell GT3e
Launch date 28 January 2015 5 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $321.97
Place in performance rating 798 721
Price now $289.99
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 13.00

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1058 MHz 800 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,151 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 512
Texture fill rate 35.97 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 IGP
Length 160 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management