NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2916 vs 1626
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 572
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8708 vs 5885
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 2536
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 1586
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 2418
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 2536
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 1586
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2916 vs 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8708 vs 5885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2916 | 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8708 | 5885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
Place in performance rating | 798 | 721 |
Price now | $289.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | No outputs |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |