NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 657 MHz
Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 231
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2728
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3333
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2728
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3333

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	667 MHz vs 657 MHz
Memory clock speed	3008 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	287 vs 231
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 vs 2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 768 vs 576
Around 31% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1714 vs 1363
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5605 vs 4566
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.673 vs 12.383
Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 vs 358.892
Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.512 vs 1.107
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 vs 21.761
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.992 vs 40.703
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 2294
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 2294

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 576
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1714 vs 1363
Geekbench - OpenCL	5605 vs 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	15.673 vs 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	509.958 vs 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.512 vs 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.422 vs 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	53.992 vs 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836 vs 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836 vs 2294

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1714

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

287

231

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4566

5605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.383

15.673

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

358.892

509.958

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.107

1.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.761

30.422

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.703

53.992

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2294

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3605

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2294

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3605

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3362

3333

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1363	1714
PassMark - G2D Mark	287	231
Geekbench - OpenCL	4566	5605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.383	15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	358.892	509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.107	1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	21.761	30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	40.703	53.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2294	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2294	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK106	GK106
Launch date	23 July 2013	30 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$84.95
Place in performance rating	1101	1114
Price now	$159.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	10.91
Technical info
Core clock speed	667 MHz	657 MHz
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops	1,009 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	576	768
Texture fill rate	32.02 GTexel / s	42.05 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		657 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	48.0 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3008 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
TXAA