NVIDIA Quadro K5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 12.6x more texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 1536 vs 32
- 30.1x better floating-point performance: 2,169 gflops vs 72 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 22.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3987 vs 174
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 41
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1687
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1687
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 August 2012 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops vs 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3987 vs 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 vs 41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1687 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 122 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3987 | 174 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | 41 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 681.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1687 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK104 | G96C |
Launch date | 17 August 2012 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 669 | 1585 |
Price now | $1,950 | $59.46 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | 5.88 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,169 gflops | 72 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |