NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2878 vs 1626
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 5885
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2418
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2418
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2878 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 vs 5885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2418 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 313
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 313 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2878 | 1626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 5885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2418 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 824 | 721 |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |