NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8.9x more pipelines: 640 vs 72
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3241 vs 2231
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10582 vs 10003
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3175
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 1671
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3175
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 72 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3241 vs 2231 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 vs 10003 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 vs 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3175 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 318
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 vs 318 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3241 | 2231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 | 509 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 10003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3175 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Skylake GT4e |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 767 | 665 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |