NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1163 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 56.64 GTexel / s vs 55.04 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 1,812 gflops vs 1,761 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3994 vs 3854
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 561
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 47.041
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 April 2016 vs 5 March 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1163 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s vs 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops vs 1,761 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3994 vs 3854 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 vs 47.041 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 vs 639.056
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 vs 3.697
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 vs 35.796
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 vs 225.868
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 vs 5523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3325
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 vs 5523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 vs 639.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 vs 3.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 vs 35.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 vs 225.868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 vs 5523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 vs 5523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3994 | 3854 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 561 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13989 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5523 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5523 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 8 April 2016 | 5 March 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 578 | 524 |
| Price now | $409.99 | $449.59 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | 11.01 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1163 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 796 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,812 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 56.64 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 201 mm | 210 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
ATIRadeon E2400
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M290X
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8530M
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro M2000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
