NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro D700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6337 vs 6051
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6337 vs 6051
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 18 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5480 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 vs 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 vs 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25198 vs 16429
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 2,099 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25198 vs 16429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD FirePro D700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4293 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | 25198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | AMD FirePro D700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 18 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 469 | 564 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M60
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
