NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 285

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 918 MHz
  • 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 190 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3043
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3043
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2782
  • Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2782
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 January 2017 vs 2 September 2014
Core clock speed 1025 MHz vs 918 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 190 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 2782

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

  • Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
  • Around 57% better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 383
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 4286
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 6337
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 6337
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 102.8 GTexel / s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 3,290 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 vs 383
PassMark - G3D Mark 6680 vs 4286
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6474 vs 6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6474 vs 6337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
383
597
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4286
6680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6337
6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6337
6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
2782
Name NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 285
PassMark - G2D Mark 383 597
PassMark - G3D Mark 4286 6680
Geekbench - OpenCL 16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6337 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6337 6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 2782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 71.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 390.891
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2778

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 285

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM206 Tonga
Launch date 11 January 2017 2 September 2014
Place in performance rating 469 448
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $249

Technical info

Core clock speed 1025 MHz 918 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,099 gflops 3,290 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1792
Texture fill rate 65.6 GTexel / s 102.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 190 Watt
Transistor count 2,940 million 5,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 88 GB / s 176.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz 5500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)