NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 700 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
5.2x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 286 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
Around 53% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4292 vs 1309
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3323
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3323

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 January 2017 vs 12 August 2008
Core clock speed	1025 MHz vs 700 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 286 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4292 vs 1309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3323

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2

3.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Around 56% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1024
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 382

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 800 vs 1024
Floating-point performance	2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 2,099 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	565 vs 382

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

382

565

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4292

1309

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3323

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3323

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G2D Mark	382	565
PassMark - G3D Mark	4292	1309
Geekbench - OpenCL	16429
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3323
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3323

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile	ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale
Code name	GM206	R700
Launch date	11 January 2017	12 August 2008
Place in performance rating	469	436
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$550
Technical info
Core clock speed	1025 MHz	700 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,099 gflops	2x 1,120.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	1024	2x 800
Texture fill rate	65.6 GTexel / s	2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	286 Watt
Transistor count	2,940 million	956 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 1 GB
Memory bandwidth	88 GB / s	2x 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5