NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 2x 128
• 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 197 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
• 5.5x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4292 vs 798
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3238
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3238

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1025 MHz
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 65.6 GTexel / s
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 382

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	382 518
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4292 798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3238

Compare specifications (specs)