NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 680 MHz
12.4x more texture fill rate: 67.2 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
8.5x more pipelines: 1,024 vs 120
13.2x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
25.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5526 vs 219

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 1 January 2009
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 680 MHz
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1,024 vs 120
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5526 vs 219

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 405 vs 402

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	405 vs 402

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5526

219

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

405

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M	ATI Mobility FireGL V5725
PassMark - G3D Mark	5526	219
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	405
Geekbench - OpenCL	16049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M	ATI Mobility FireGL V5725
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	TeraScale
Code name	GM204	M86
Launch date	18 August 2015	1 January 2009
Place in performance rating	495	387
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	1050 MHz	680 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	1,024	120
Texture fill rate	67.2 GTexel / s	5.44 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	378 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus