NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 286 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6226 vs 1309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 12 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 vs 1309 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1,280
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 423
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3323 vs 3093
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3323 vs 3093
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 1,280 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 423 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3323 vs 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3323 vs 3093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18998 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | R700 |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 12 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 547 | 438 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $550 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |