NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce 920A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 8.5x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 384
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6226 vs 846
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 168
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18998 vs 3693
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1,280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 vs 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18998 vs 3693 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920A
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce 920A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6226 | 846 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18998 | 3693 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | NVIDIA GeForce 920A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | GK208B |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 547 | 1143 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |