NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce 920A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 70% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 8.5x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 384
  • 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6226 vs 846
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 168
  • 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18998 vs 3693
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 975 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 9.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1,280 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6226 vs 846
PassMark - G2D Mark 423 vs 168
Geekbench - OpenCL 18998 vs 3693

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920A

  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6226
846
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
423
168
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
18998
3693
Name NVIDIA Quadro M4000M NVIDIA GeForce 920A
PassMark - G3D Mark 6226 846
PassMark - G2D Mark 423 168
Geekbench - OpenCL 18998 3693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 81.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 68.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 251.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3093
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M NVIDIA GeForce 920A

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name GM204 GK208B
Launch date 18 August 2015 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 547 1143
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1013 MHz
Core clock speed 975 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops 441.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1,280 384
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s 9.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 160 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus