NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 13% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 863 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1013 MHz vs 900 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 57.735
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.505
Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 68.443 vs 37.407
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.464 vs 174.323

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 23 May 2013
Core clock speed	975 MHz vs 863 MHz
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	81.104 vs 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.157 vs 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	68.443 vs 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	251.464 vs 174.323

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

2.1x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1,280
Around 67% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8012 vs 6190
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 419
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24047 vs 19089
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1235.338
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 7602
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2749
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3093
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 7602
Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2749
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3093

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	160.5 billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1,280
Floating-point performance	4,156 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8012 vs 6190
PassMark - G2D Mark	591 vs 419
Geekbench - OpenCL	24047 vs 19089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1269.688 vs 1235.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9064 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9064 vs 7602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 2749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3093

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6190

8012

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

419

591

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

19089

24047

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

81.104

57.735

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1235.338

1269.688

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.157

5.505

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

68.443

37.407

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

251.464

174.323

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7602

9064

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2749

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3093

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7602

9064

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2749

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3093

3358

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark	6190	8012
PassMark - G2D Mark	419	591
Geekbench - OpenCL	19089	24047
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	81.104	57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1235.338	1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.157	5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	68.443	37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	251.464	174.323
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7602	9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2749	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3093	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7602	9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2749	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3093	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	2784

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M4000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GM204	GK110
Launch date	18 August 2015	23 May 2013
Place in performance rating	552	454
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Price now		$740.99
Value for money (0-100)		12.94
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz	900 MHz
Core clock speed	975 MHz	863 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	4,156 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,280	2304
Texture fill rate	78 GTexel / s	160.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2304
Maximum GPU temperature		95 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Minimum recommended system power		600 Watt
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
PhysX
TXAA