NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1174 vs 799
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 60
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1174 vs 799 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 60 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 5935
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 3122
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 3122
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 vs 5935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 vs 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1174 | 799 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 60 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5935 | 13337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | 3258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GT200B |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1073 | 1347 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |