NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 13.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11908 vs 9603
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 10116
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 10116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11908 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 10116 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 698
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53783 vs 39431
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53783 vs 39431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11908 | 9603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | 53783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM200 | Fiji |
Launch date | 5 March 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 232 | 277 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |