NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 285.2 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
  • 13.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11908 vs 9603
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 10116
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 10116
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 March 2016 vs 10 July 2015
Boost clock speed 1114 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 285.2 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11908 vs 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 vs 10116

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

  • Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
  • Around 5% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 698
  • Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53783 vs 39431
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 3584 vs 3072
Floating-point performance 7,168 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 797 vs 698
Geekbench - OpenCL 53783 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11908
9603
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
698
797
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39431
53783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13107
10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13107
10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark 11908 9603
PassMark - G2D Mark 698 797
Geekbench - OpenCL 39431 53783
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13107 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13107 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 140.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3595.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 13.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 132.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 789.536
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4739

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 3.0
Code name GM200 Fiji
Launch date 5 March 2016 10 July 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $4,999 $549
Place in performance rating 232 277
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Price now $399.99
Value for money (0-100) 35.98

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1114 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 988 MHz
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops 7,168 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 3072 3584
Texture fill rate 285.2 GTexel / s 224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 8,000 million 8,900 million
Compute units 56
Stream Processors 3584

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin ​2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 317.4 GB / s 512 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 4096 bit
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)